From Civic Loneliness to Participation Ecosystems: Rethinking Youth Agency in the Digital Public Sphere after Diagnoza Młodzieży 2026

Authors

  • Matteo Bartolini Independent Expert

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24917/ycee.13109

Keywords:

youth participation, political efficacy, digital participation;, civic engagement, youth policy, institutional trust

Abstract

Diagnoza Młodzieży 2026 (Youth Diagnosis 2026) identifies a tension that deserves particular attention: young people express an interest in public affairs and a desire to influence decisions, yet many experience low political efficacy and perceive formal channels of participation as weak or ineffective. At the same time, civic activity increasingly takes place within a digital ecosystem that expands opportunities for information, expression and mobilisation while also exposing young people to disinformation, fragmented attention and algorithmic influence. This commentary argues that these findings are best interpreted through a participation-ecosystem lens rather than through a binary opposition between online and offline engagement. Drawing on research on digital participation, political efficacy and meaningful youth participation, it proposes an analytical distinction between access, voice, audience, influence and institutional response. This perspective can strengthen future measurement of youth participation by asking not only whether young people participate, but whether their participation is heard, traceable and capable of producing feedback or influence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boulianne, S., & Theocharis, Y. (2020). Young people, digital media, and engagement: A meta-analysis of research. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318814190

Council of Europe. (2026). Recommendation CM/Rec(2026)3 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the European Charter on the Participation of Young People in Local and Regional Life.

European Commission. (2025, February 19). Results of the 2024 EU Youth Survey. EU Child Participation Platform. https://eu-for-children.europa.eu/activities-news/latest/results-of-2024-eu-youth-survey_en

Lundy, L. (2007). ‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033

OECD. (2024a). OECD Youth Policy Toolkit. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/74b6f8f3-en

OECD. (2024b). OECD Survey on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions – 2024 Results: Building Trust in a Complex Policy Environment. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9a20554b-en

Oser, J., & Boulianne, S. (2020). Reinforcement effects between digital media use and political participation: A meta-analysis of repeated-wave panel data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa017

Polskie Towarzystwo Polityki Społecznej. (2026). Diagnoza Młodzieży 2026: Raport i rekomendacje (P. Rabiej, Ed.).

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

How to Cite

Bartolini, M. (2026). From Civic Loneliness to Participation Ecosystems: Rethinking Youth Agency in the Digital Public Sphere after Diagnoza Młodzieży 2026. Youth in Central and Eastern Europe, 13(22). https://doi.org/10.24917/ycee.13109