New school culture? The question on potential impact of distance education during the COVID-19 pandemy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24917/ycee.9277Keywords:
distance education, school culture, pupil-teacher interaction, ritualsAbstract
Although the origins of remote education date back to the 18th century (Kentnor, 2015) however, only recently, in the second decade of the 21st century, due to a natural experiment that the COVID-19 pandemic has become, remote learning began to play a key role in mass global education. In these unprecedented times of reorganisation of time and space in order to ensure the continuity of social life, the school, subjected to a major organisational transformation, changed its form from the traditional setting (characterised by a clear division of time and space, i.e. lessons in the school classroom) to the virtual setting, escaping this division. The aim of the conducted research study is to describe to what extent the functioning of the institution of the school has changed (if at all) due to its virtual environment, with particular reference to the school culture understood as “the beliefs, views, attitudes and relationships, and the written and unwritten rules that shape every aspect of the school as an institution (...) and community” (Ward, Burke, 2004:1). In other words, the question considered is how and what has changed in the functioning of the school, with particular regards to school rituals, teaching strategies, and the interactions of school actors, as a result of remote education? Has online education changed the way teachers and students behave and perceive school?
The results of the study reveal that the functioning of the "virtual school" as compared to the "traditional school" in its essence remains unchanged due to the strong, long-standing cultural codes instilled by and within the institution of the school. In the virtual classroom, as in the material classroom, assessment and grading are teachers' strategies for recalling the definition of the school situation; moreover, they often become a survival strategy to maintain control over the group, in order to sustain ontological security (Giddens, 1984) in the performance of the school roles of teacher and student.
Downloads
References
Giddens, A. (2003). Stanowienie społeczeństwa. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka.
Giroux, H. (2020). On Critical Pedagogy. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Giroux, H., Witkowski, L. (2010). Edukacja i sfera publiczna. Idee i doświadczenia pedagogiki radykalnej. Kraków: Impuls.
Goffman, E. (1990). The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. Great Britain by Clays Ltd, The Penguin Press.
Hammersley, M., Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography. Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.
Kawecki, I. (1996). Etnografia i szkoła. Kraków: Impuls.
Kentnor, H. (2015). Distance Education and the Evolution of Online Learning in the United States. University of Denver.
McLaren, P. (2005). Life in Schools: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundations of Education. New York: Paradigm Publishers.
McLaren, P. (1999). Schooling as a Ritual Performance. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Mikiewicz, P. (2016). Socjologia edukacji: teorie, koncepcje, pojęcia. Warszawa: PWN.
Ward, R. E., Burke, M. A. (2004). Improving Achievement Low Performing School. Thousand Oaks, Calif, Corwin Press.
Woods, P. (1980). Pupil Strategies. Explorations in the Sociology of the School. London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Youth in Central and Eastern Europe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.